Why The Iran “Deal” is a LIE and the Iranian Shia Muslims Can NEVER be Trusted!

So far, I haven’t seen or heard anyone in the media of mass deception discuss the concept of taqiyya, which is a Shia Islamic permission written in the Koran that allows Muslims to lie when they are caught up in several kinds of circumstances.

Sharia Unveiled: What Is Taqiyya? – David Wood Presentation (Video) has the video, additional information about another form of lying within Islam called “Kitman,” additional links, and the verses in the Koran that teach both of these political Islam lying techniques.

*Video courtesy of: David Wood @ Acts17Apologetics & Answering Muslims

Perhaps Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer and a few other Democrats on the Hill are aware of the Taqiyya and Kitman lying concepts within Islam and that is why they have publicly come out against the awful Iran deal!

Or, it just might be the realization of true Islam:

Hat tip:
Sharia Unveiled

Utterly Preposterous

Was thinking of doing a post about the worst deal anyone could have ever imagined – the Iran nuke deal – as well as the leftist rants against the 47 Republican conservative lawmakers (remember that…they are LAWMAKERS); but this political cartoon states the obvious:

I watched part of the Senate hearing on the authorization of a new AMUF, and Secretary of State John Kerry just had to go out and spew all kinds of nonsense regarding the concerns of not only the 47 Senators that signed onto the letter to Tehran (and also meant for this BADministration to look at!); but the concerns of millions of Americans, too!   Kerry just ended up looking silly when Senator Rand Paul had his say!

Here are some good blog posts about all of this:

Wintery Knight: Did Republican senators do anything wrong by writing a letter to Iran’s leaders?

Excerpt:

[Steve] Hayes also had a longer form article posted at The Weekly Standard:

In a tweet this morning, NBC News senior political editor Mark Murray writes: “With GOP Senators’ Iran Move, Politics Goes Beyond the Water’s Edge.” 47 Republican Senators sent to the Supreme Leader of Iran reminding him that Congress is not bound by deals that Congress does not approve. The article Murray links to describes this as “stunning” and “unprecedented” and implies that the letter constitutes a breach of protocol so significant that it ends the long tradition of bipartisan foreign policy.

This is utterly preposterous.

The only way to reach such a conclusion is to ignore efforts by Democrats to undermine George W. Bush.

In September 2002, David Bonior, the second-ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives, flew to Baghdad in an attempt to undermine George W. Bush’s case for war in Iraq on a trip paid for by Saddam Hussein’s regime. Bonior, accompanied by Representatives Jim McDermott and Mike Thompson, actively propagandized for the Iraqi regime. McDermott, asked whether he found it acceptable to be used by the Iraqi regime, said he hoped the trip would end the suffering of children. “We don’t mind being used,” he said.

In 2004, the Democratic Party offered its full embrace of Michael Moore’s fantastical conspiracy theory,Fahrenheit 9/11. Minority Leader Tom Daschle, DNC chairman Terry MacAullife and assorted Democratic heavyweights flocked to a special screening of the film in Washington, DC, where they offered unreserved praise.

In 2007, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi traveled to Damascus, Syria, in an open attempt to undercut White House efforts to isolate Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Pelosi amplified Assad’s claims that he was ready for peace talks with Israel and wanted Syria to rejoin the international community.

The letter from Senate Republicans provides a stark contrast from these efforts. It is a straightforward, fact-based description of the U.S. constitutional system and the role Congress plays in international agreements and treaties.

It takes a selective reading of that history to conclude that this letter, as opposed to previous efforts by congressional Democrats, means the end of bipartisan foreign policy.

I think it’s wonderful that Republicans are doing everything possible to try to put the brakes on the Obama administration’s efforts to lift sanctions on Iran so that they can proceed to develop nuclear weapons at a faster pace.

And there you have it! The ongoing and completely legitimate concern is that lifting sanctions on Iran would allow them to develop nuclear weapons much sooner than if the sanctions stayed in place!

What’s more, the weasel-like rhetoric coming from “lizard-tongued” Kerry and his ilk are all smoke and mirrors! That’s right…they should LOOK IN THE MIRROR to see what they did in the past to undermine President George W. Bush – as reiterated by Steve Hayes’ article!

*******

The Last Refuge: Secretary John Kerry: “We are not negotiating a legally binding agreement with Iran”…

Ohhhhh Myyyyy!! I watched this exchange happen live on TV this morning and it was a real bang-your-head-against-the-wall moment! It made me scream across the house to my husband that Kerry is a #*&@%$@#^?! idiot and such a liar that I can’t even stand to watch and listen to him!!! Go watch the video at the Last Refuge link.

Excerpt:

Which leads to the obvious retort from Senator Tom Cotton:

Tom Cotton        ✔ @SenTomCotton

Follow

Important question: if deal with Iran isn’t legally binding, then what’s to keep Iran from breaking said deal and developing a bomb?

8:37 AM – 11 Mar 2015

617 Retweets 376 favorites

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair General Martin Dempsey testified today at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on President Obama’s request for authorization for use for military force (AUMF) against ISIS. -full hearing here-

My question… did Kerry and this Marxist/Islamic sympathizing BADministration even think of such a scenario???

However, Democrats strategically planted a question for Secretary John Kerry (by Senator Chris Murphy) to attack Republican Senators for their recent controversial open letter to Iran. Kerry had a scripted response for the question he was anticipating. Within that response was the startling statement/claim the White House is not negotiating a “legally binding agreement with Iran” to stop their nuclear weapons program.

Seriously people…the progressives (programmed regressives) in the Democrat party have completely lost their minds if they think they have any smidgen of an honest broker with these fanatical mullahs in this awful “deal-making” charade with Iran!!

 

*******

Finally, Nice Deb: Democrats Calling 47 GOP Senators Traitors is the Pot Calling the Kettle Black

Excerpt:

Soon after the letter was made public, an incensed Obama suggested that the senators were in league with mad mullahs of Tehran:

“I think it’s somewhat ironic to see some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in Iran. It’s an unusual coalition.”

Here is what the letter stated, and you tell me if they are making common cause with our enemies:

“The next president,” the letter stated, “could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen, and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”

It would seem the Republicans in Congress are in agreement with the Prime Minister of Israel and the leaders of the Arab world who fear that the Obama administration is brokering a terrible deal with the mad mullahs – a deal of appeasement and capitulation. A deal that allows Iran to go nuclear.

This is not what any sane person would call “making common cause with hard-liners.”

The photo below demonstrates the type of a man which is (supposedly) running the show:

Oh Dear Lord!!! Please save our nation and the world from this circus clown and his ilk!!!

Hat tips to all links.

Joel C. Rosenberg: Iran’s leaders reject Obama deal, calling it “unacceptable.”

Dear Readers,

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the Joint Session of Congress yesterday was so strong,  refreshing, encouraging, honest, leader-like and blunt; that there just aren’t enough adjectives to describe the excitement of hearing a REAL GENUINE LEADER after the past 6 years of drudgery under Ozero!

Netanyahu laid it all on the table – and warned America and the world about all that is wrong with our government to even consider a nuclear agreement with the radical Islamic jihadist country of Iran.  The so-called “deal” that Neville Chamberlain II, namely John Kerry, and the feckless puppet of the WH – who is being led by the nose via Iranian-born ValeriEVIL Jarrett; appears to already have been rejected by Iran!

Joel C. Rosenberg: Iran’s leaders reject Obama deal, calling it “unacceptable.” It’s been a bizarre few days. Here’s the latest.

Excerpt:

Consider the odd developments of the past few days:

* The leader of our most faithful and trusted ally comes to Washington to warn of a mortal and rising threat from a dangerous and deceiving enemy.

* The President of the United States refuses to meet with him.

* The President sends his VP out of the country to avoid our ally.

* The President sends the Secretary of State out of the country to avoid our ally, and instead to meet with our enemy.

* The President refuses to allow any of his Cabinet Members attend the speech by our ally.

* The White House pressures Members of Congress to boycott the speech of our ally.

* The President’s first comment after the ally’s speech is that he didn’t bother to watch or listen to it.

If I had written that as a novel, would anyone buy it? Of course not. They would say, “That’s ridiculous! That’s not credible! No President would act that way.”

Yet this is exactly what is happening. Truth is stranger than fiction.

Now comes the news that even though President Obama is bending over backwards to make concessions to Iran, the Iranian leadership has now utterly rejected the President’s deal, calling it “unacceptable.” That’s the first thing Iran and Israel have every agreed on. More on that in a moment.

A radio host asked me this morning: Did Israel’s Prime Minister come to Congress to boost his political fortunes because he’s in a neck-and-neck race back home? No. That’s not it.

Mr. Netanyahu came because he believes Israel is in mortal danger if Iranian leaders driven by “Apocalyptic Islam” are able to build atomic weapons and the high-speed missiles to deliver them. Netanyahu knew there was a huge risk in coming to the U.S. amidst such controversy. But he also knows that if he does not come back to power as Prime Minister after March 17th that he would never be able to forgive himself if he failed to use his time in office to raise the alarm and urge his friends, the American people, to stop Iran from getting The Bomb, rather than putting Iran on a legal pathway to The Bomb.

The Bible says in Ezekiel 33:1-9 that if the watchman on the wall sees a threat emerging, he must warn people, or he will be held to account.

Read it all HERE

Joel writes at the end:

“Iran will not accept excessive and illogical demands,” Zarif was quoted by Fars as saying.

Wouldn’t it be ironic if Iran saves us from this dangerous, disastrous deal?”

And, don’t miss Joel’s post about seeing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the Joint Session of Congress yesterday!!!

On eve of Purim, Netanyahu warns of rising Persian threat to Israel & the world and danger of making a bad deal with Tehran

Excerpt:

That was one for the ages.

In 25 years living in or near the nation’s capital, I have never actually been to a Joint Session of Congress. But if there was ever a speech I wanted to hear, it was this one.

I wish you could have been there with me. It was so fascinating — and so humbling — to be in the House Chamber as the Prime Minister of Israel arrived to thunderous and continuous applause.

As I listened to him speak, I felt I was witnessing history being made, as if Winston Churchill himself were personally warning us of the gathering storm.

On the eve of Purim, the Jewish holiday remembering the Biblical book of Esther and the Persian plot to annihilate the Jewish people 2,500 years ago, Prime Minister Netanyahu warned the world of a new Persian/Iranian threat to Israel and the world. He made it clear how dangerous this Iran deal is, and Iran’s repeated threats to annihilate Israel and the U.S., and why we need to work together to stop Iran, not help them get The Bomb. [To read the transcript of the speech, please click here]

It was electric in that chamber. One standing ovation after another. From Democrats and Republicans. Liberals and conservatives. Young and old. Rabbis and pastors. There was such a sense of unity and warmth and bipartisanship. It was so rare, and so refreshing — I’ve never experienced anything else like it in the political realm!  [To watch the video of the speech, please click here].

Read it all HERE.

Hat tip: Joel C. Rosenberg’s blog.

*******

How To Know God Personally [Click on link to discover the principles!]

What does it take to begin a relationship with God? Devote yourself to unselfish religious deeds? Become a better person so that God will accept you?

You may be surprised that none of those things will work. But God has made it very clear in the Bible how we can know Him.

The following principles will explain how you can personally begin a relationship with God, right now, through Jesus Christ…

John Kerry Warns Israel Could Become “Apartheid State”

 

After hearing John Kerry’s absolutely appalling and stupid comments about the breakdown in talks between Israel and the Palestinians, I just couldn’t let the day go by without writing a post. However, Nice Deb has done an excellent and comprehensive post about it at her blog!

Nice Deb: John Kerry Warns Israel Could Become “Apartheid State”.

Senator Ted Cruz was quick to point out how utterly foolish, wrong and despicable Kerry’s comments were. He was one of the first to publically state that Kerry should resign as Secretary of State. On Special Report with Brett Baier, Charles Krauthammer stated that Cruz was absolutely correct!

Excerpt from Nice Deb post:

Via Josh Rogin at The Daily Beast, this is getting quite a bit of attention, today:

The secretary of state said that if Israel doesn’t make peace soon, it could become ‘an apartheid state,’ like the old South Africa. Jewish leaders are fuming over the comparison.

If there’s no two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon, Israel risks becoming “an apartheid state,” Secretary of State John Kerry told a room of influential world leaders in a closed-door meeting Friday.

Senior American officials have rarely, if ever, used the term “apartheid” in reference to Israel, and President Obama has previously rejected the idea that the word should apply to the Jewish state. Kerry’s use of the loaded term is already rankling Jewish leaders in America—and it could attract unwanted attention in Israel, as well.

***

“A two-state solution will be clearly underscored as the only real alternative. Because a unitary state winds up either being an apartheid state with second-class citizens—or it ends up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish state,” Kerry told the group of senior officials and experts from the U.S., Western Europe, Russia, and Japan. “Once you put that frame in your mind, that reality, which is the bottom line, you understand how imperative it is to get to the two-state solution, which both leaders, even yesterday, said they remain deeply committed to.”

According to the 1998 Rome Statute, the “crime of apartheid” is defined as “inhumane acts… committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.” The term is most often used in reference to the system of racial segregation and oppression that governed South Africa from 1948 until 1994.

Here is how apartheid Israel is:

Arabs in Israel have equal voting rights; in fact, it is one of the few places in the Middle East where Arab women may vote. Arabs in 2011 held 14 seats in the 120-seat Knesset. Israeli Arabs have also held various government posts, including one who served as Israel’s ambassador to Finland and the deputy mayor of Tel Aviv. Oscar Abu Razaq was appointed Director General of the Ministry of Interior, the first Arab citizen to become chief executive of a key government ministry. Ariel Sharon’s original cabinet included the first Arab minister, Salah Tarif, a Druze who served as a minister without portfolio. An Arab is also a Supreme Court justice. In October 2005, an Arab professor was named Vice President of Haifa University.

Arabic, like Hebrew, is an official language in Israel. More than 300,000 Arab children attend Israeli schools. At the time of Israel’s founding, there was one Arab high school in the country. Today, there are hundreds of Arab schools.29

The sole legal distinction between Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel is that the latter are not required to serve in the Israeli army. This is to spare Arab citizens the need to take up arms against their brethren. Nevertheless, Bedouinshave served in paratroop units and other Arabs have volunteered for military duty. Compulsory military service is applied to the Druze and Circassian communities at their own request.

Some economic and social gaps between Israeli Jews and Arabs result from the latter not serving in the military. Veterans qualify for many benefits not available to non-veterans. Moreover, the army aids in the socialization process.

On the other hand, Arabs do have an advantage in obtaining some jobs during the years Israelis are in the military. In addition, industries like construction and trucking have come to be dominated by Israeli Arabs.

Although Israeli Arabs have occasionally been involved in terrorist activities, they have generally behaved as loyal citizens. During the 1967, 1973 and 1982 wars, none engaged in any acts of sabotage or disloyalty. Sometimes, in fact, Arabs volunteered to take over civilian functions for reservists. During the Palestinian War that began in September 2000, Israeli Arabs for the first time engaged in widespread protests..

Read it all HERE

 

*******

 

IMHO, John Kerry “let the cat out of the bag” regarding the TRUE opinions of the Obama Regime. You can bet that ANYTHING Kerry says regarding the Middle East is “screened” by the leftist radicals currently squatting in the White House.

It is my hope that more people become aware of the true intentions of the ObaMARXIST BADministration! I wonder if this terrible rhetoric from Kerry was reported in the mainstream media? Even Fox has been a bit too preoccupied with the racist remarks of a billionaire on several of it’s evening news and analysis shows. It’s a typical tactic – scream about racist remarks – in order to draw attention away from Obama’s international troubles and failures. I’m sure that others have noticed the unending and ongoing “cry racism” tactic over the entire 6 ugly years that Zero has been pResident?

Oh I see…now I’ll be called a racist because I think that Obummer’s failed pResidency is such a huge failure? We can’t call it as we see it because Obama is the first “black” pResident?

Isn’t it ironic that Sterling has been called out for racist comments (and fined!) in the past? But now, such a big deal is being made about these new comments? Smells fishy…doesn’t it? The media of mass deception propaganda machine is in full swing tonight!

You know what they say…timing is everything?  The racist rant sounds more like a huge fight that broke out between Sterling and his former (too-young) girlfriend; and  is being utilized in order to draw attention away from Kerry’s despicable comments!

Talk Wisdom Reports – You Decide.

Hat tip:

Nice Deb

Update:

Oh great…now Kerry is trying to backtrack his awful statement by doing a press release to “clarify” his comments!

The Gateway Pundit: John Kerry Releases “Clarification” on His Disgusting Apartheid Comments on Israel

If you read it carefully, you will see that Kerry can’t even admit that he was wrong for saying what he did – and further – he actually says that Netanyahu, as well as other Israeli leaders once made the same “apartheid” comparison too!

Sorry…but I just have to write this: What a TOTAL A$$ KERRY IS!!!

 

Hat tip:  The Gateway Pundit