This is a new video just posted on December 16, 2015. Here is the premise of the video:
DAVID WHEELER (ACTOR) PLAYED TWO (2) ROLES IN THE SANDY HOOK HOAX!
WHEELER PLAYED “FATHER OF DEAD KID” BUT ALSO PLAYED “FBI SWAT GUY.” HE IS A PROFESSIONAL ACTOR.
WATCH TVNEWS VIDEO OF DAVID WHEELER WALKING AROUND SANDY HOOK IN FULL SWAT GEAR!
THIS PROVES THE “NEWTOWN CT MASSACRE” WAS 100% FAKE. SANDY HOOK WAS A HOAX TO TRICK AMERICANS OUT OF THEIR GUNS.
YOU HAVE MY [owner of the video] PERMISSION TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO AND RE-UPLOAD THIS VIDEO TO YOUR OWN CHANNEL, YOUR OWN WEBSITE(S), AND YOUR OWN BLOGS.
PLEASE SHOW YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY! WE MUST WAKE AMERICANS UP BEFORE WE GET DISARMED BY TRAITORS.
Talk Wisdom reports – you decide. See this entire video and decide for yourself what is the truth about Sandy Hook and what is a lie!
“If it weren’t for my TV, I wouldn’t know what is real” – quote from Brandon Heath’s song “Leaving Eden.”
If Heath’s video doesn’t play on this site, view here:
YouTube: Leaving Eden by Brandon Heath
Comment at site:
SOGTrueBeliever 1 year ago (edited)
We were created for Eden a perfect world with easy communion between us and God. Due to the effects of sin both us and the earth have fallen but God is in the process of restoring us and he will bring us back to Eden when we meet him in the new heaven and earth. Our True home with him is more magnificent and glorious than we can comprehend!
Amen!
*******
Note: Some events are complete hoaxes. Others are more accurately labeled and described as “false flag events.” The link below explains in detail. I have included an excerpt.
Truthshock: Anatomy of False Flag Events
Excerpt:
What is a False-Flag?
What exactly is a false flag, why is it called false flag? The term false-flag is a naval term from the age of sail that refers to a ship flying the colors (flag) of a country other than the one the ship belonged. This was done for multiple reasons but a common one was to lure an enemy vessel into gun or boarding range and then at the last moment drop the false flag and run up the true colors before attacking. It was fair sport to use false flags but considered immoral/unethical to attack under one. To the point that it was never done. But that was a different age…
The simplest definition of a false-flag is an event in which the actual perpetrators and the reported or blamed perpetrators are different. The classic use of a false-flag, and hence the military origin of it’s name, goes as follows. Country A’s King wants to conquer and loot Country B’s land to enrich himself. Of course if this is what King A tells his army they may choose not to fight or revolt. Or best case their effort will be lacking. In order to get the most out of their soldiers, the commanders need them to be emotionally involved… anger, hatred, revenge. Now the skilled orator and manipulator might be able to create this mood with just words. But not many have this level of skill. It is much easier to motivate and/or raise an army if one’s country has been attacked, hence you are acting in defense. And this is where the false flag comes in. Country A’s King and its top General(s) conspire to launch an attack against itself, claiming that the attackers were from Country B. The attack needs to be big enough to create real panic and fear, and for maximum affect there needs to be real deaths. The attackers need be convincing in their role as soldiers of Country B, so clothes, uniform, weapons need to match appropriately. The likely hood of success of the attack is high since it would be unexpected or a surprise attack. Even if the attack were to technically fail, the fact alone of an attack might be enough to manipulate a response. King A could use men from within to execute the attack, or it might be better to use mercenaries. Regardless, a successful attack will incense the populace against the ‘evil’ Country B, and therefor justify an invasion.
The above is just one example, or a classic example of a false-flag. However, it is very important to understand that the false-flag event can take on countless forms. I recently read a comment where the commentator stated that because actual people died it was not a false-flag. The defining characteristic of a false-flag is not it’s specific type or whether or not non-actors died, or even if the event occurred at all, meaning the entire reported event is a fabrication. One defining characteristic is that the real perpetrator is never known or revealed. So the author or director/producer of the ‘production’ is unknown. The audience’s attention is locked on the stage, the villain, clearly identified through the official narrative, is known. But who are behind the curtains? When a staged play is sold as real then the actors become irrelevant, what is important is who are the Producers! Who are the people that wrote, directed, and funded the event? These are the real perpetrators, not the actors on the stage. Cui Bono?… Who Benefits?
The other defining characteristic is that the event is a catalyst for the true objectives. Thus the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution. From the example above, the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the populations reaction. The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.
Why use False-Flags?
As explained in the previous section the classic false-flag was used to justify an invasion of another country. But there are numerous motivations for using false-flags. Thus the false-flag event has been used throughout history to initiate change. Problem-Reaction-Solution. If the change that the leader(s) want is not going to be wanted or accepted by the population then the false-flag is an excellent tool in order enact said change. So the false-flag is a tool of manipulation(deception) to direct the opinions and actions of the populace. This problem-reaction-solution model of the false-flag is but one tool of the social engineers who are directing the actors on the world stage. While the audience, the 99.9% of the world, much more than just mere spectators, are directly affected by these ‘engineers’ from the moment of their birth until the time of their passing. They (we) are actually unknowing-unwilling participants in the machinations of the .1%.
Talk Wisdom reports – you decide.
Hat tips to all links.
You might be led to despair after seeing and reading about all of this! But take heart! Jesus Christ has overcome the world!
Rom 8:1
There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, [fn] who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.
Rom 8:2
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:3
For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh,
Rom 8:4
that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Rom 8:5
For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit.
Rom 8:6
For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
Rom 8:7
Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be.
Rom 8:8
So then, those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
Rom 8:9
But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His.
Rom 8:10
And if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.
Rom 8:11
But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you.
Rom 8:12
Therefore, brethren, we are debtors—not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh.
Rom 8:13
For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.
Rom 8:14
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.
Rom 8:15
For you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, “Abba, Father.”
Rom 8:16
The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,
Rom 8:17
and if children, then heirs—heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him, that we may also be glorified together.
Rom 8:18
For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
Rom 8:19
For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God.
Rom 8:20
For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope;
Rom 8:21
because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
Rom 8:22
For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now.
Rom 8:23
Not only that, but we also who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body.
Rom 8:24
For we were saved in this hope, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one still hope for what he sees?
Rom 8:25
But if we hope for what we do not see, we eagerly wait for it with perseverance.
Rom 8:26
Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us [fn] with groanings which cannot be uttered.
Rom 8:27
Now He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He makes intercession for the saints according to the will of God.
Rom 8:28
And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose.
Rom 8:29
For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.
Rom 8:30
Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified.
Rom 8:31
What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?
Rom 8:32
He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?
Rom 8:33
Who shall bring a charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies.
Rom 8:34
Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us.
Rom 8:35
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
Rom 8:36
As it is written:
“For Your sake we are killed all day long;
We are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.” [fn]Rom 8:37
Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us.
Rom 8:38
For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come,
Rom 8:39
nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
NKJV Footnotes
(8:1)
NU-Text omits the rest of this verse.
(8:26)
NU-Text omits for us.
(8:36)
Psalm 44:22
Tags: Demonic politics, Exposing far leftists, false flag events, Foolish wisdom of the world, Jesus has overcome the world!, media of mass deception, overcome, Romans 8, Sandy Hook, Talk Wisdom reports you decide
Talk Wisdom 
December 20, 2015 at 9:59 pm |
From your link:
“…the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution. …the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the populations reaction. The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.”
CJW: “If it weren’t for my TV, I wouldn’t know what is real” – quote from Brandon Heath’s song “Leaving Eden.”
”I only know what I hear on Fox News” – quote from Randolph Linn, convicted arsonist
Gee, not a whole lot of difference there, is it?
In the three years since the Sandy Hook murders, there have been a number of similar incidents. The reactions to them have always been the same: one side wants to severely restrict public access to firearms. The other side, fearing this will happen, rushes out to buy even more of the soon-to-be-forbidden weapons…but the required legislation never passes, while more guns appear on the streets, which makes it even easier for the next mass shooting to take place. The National Rifle Association fosters the myth of the “good guy with a gun” who could foil a good many crimes if he were properly armed, and meanwhile families and communities are devastated. Adam Lanza’s mother had a fair-sized arsenal in her home, and she was the first victim of her son’s killing spree. Cui bono, indeed!
Ask Remington and Colt and Taurus and Dan Wesson who really benefits from incidents like Sandy Hook.
Ironically, one Oregon sheriff who derided Sandy Hook as a hoax three years ago is now trying to defend a similar shooting in his own jurisdiction as the real thing.
So the whole Iraq war was a false-flag operation? Some suspected it all along.
Less than eighteen months after we invaded, the Pentagon satisfied themselves that the “weapons of mass destruction” we went there to seize did not exist. A few months after that, word got out that Iraq and its leader had had nothing whatever to do with 9/11/01, even though the government insisted that they had. We might have said “Sorry we f****d up your country, but hey, we got rid of Saddam for you. We’ll leave now. Here, have a few billion.” Instead, we stayed another 10 years because by then—well, the Iraqis were shooting at us! Again, who benefits?
Halliburton and Blackwater and other defense contractors did. The soldiers themselves…not so much.
CJW: You might be led to despair after seeing all of this! But take heart! Jesus Christ has overcome the world!
Which Jesus is that—the one who weeps for the victims, or the one who did nothing to stop the killing?
LikeLike
December 21, 2015 at 12:06 am |
From your link:
“…the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution. …the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the populations reaction. The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.”
CJW: “If it weren’t for my TV, I wouldn’t know what is real” – quote from Brandon Heath’s song “Leaving Eden.”
”I only know what I hear on Fox News” – quote from Randolph Linn, convicted arsonist
Gee, not a whole lot of difference there, is it?
In the three years since the Sandy Hook murders, there have been a number of similar incidents. The reactions to them have always been the same: one side wants to severely restrict public access to firearms. The other side, fearing this will happen, rushes out to buy even more of the soon-to-be-forbidden weapons…but the required legislation never passes, while more guns appear on the streets, which makes it even easier for the next mass shooting to take place. The National Rifle Association fosters the myth of the “good guy with a gun” who could foil a good many crimes if he were properly armed, and meanwhile families and communities are devastated. Adam Lanza’s mother had a fair-sized arsenal in her home, and she was the first victim of her son’s killing spree. Cui bono, indeed!
Ask Remington and Colt and Taurus and Dan Wesson who really benefits from incidents like Sandy Hook.
Ironically, one Oregon sheriff who derided Sandy Hook as a hoax three years ago is now trying to defend a similar shooting in his own jurisdiction as the real thing.
So the whole Iraq war was a false-flag operation? Some suspected it all along.
Less than eighteen months after we invaded, the Pentagon satisfied themselves that the “weapons of mass destruction” we went there to seize did not exist. A few months after that, word got out that Iraq and its leader had had nothing whatever to do with 9/11/01, even though the government insisted that they had. We might have said “Sorry we f****d up your country, but hey, we got rid of Saddam for you. We’ll leave now. Here, have a few billion.” Instead, we stayed another 10 years because by then—well, the Iraqis were shooting at us! Again, who benefits?
Halliburton and Blackwater and other defense contractors did. The soldiers themselves…not so much.
CJW: You might be led to despair after seeing all of this! But take heart! Jesus Christ has overcome the world!
Which Jesus is that—the one who weeps for the victims, or the one who did nothing to stop the killing?
LikeLike
December 21, 2015 at 2:58 am |
So…nothing to say about the crisis actor – David Wheeler – who has been exposed as playing two roles in the Sandy Hook false flag event?
LikeLike
December 21, 2015 at 7:32 am |
Sure. Provide “book, chapter and verse”. Your link claims he had two roles in this; how does the writer know, and what other evidence can he provide? This guy looks like someone I served with at my last duty station, but he’s barely old enough.
Do you really believe that a man whose career is performing in front of cameras wouldn’t be aware of a situation where one might compare videos?
Also, why didn’t you call ‘false flag’ on the whole Iraq War? Quite a few other people did, including the press when they realized they’d been led by the nose the same way the public was.
LikeLike
December 21, 2015 at 4:09 pm |
Did you even view the video? That is proof enough that the same man portrayed the two roles in the Sandy Hook false flag hoax.
There is plenty more evidence out there – do some research.
My husband commented on how an AR-15 rifle could not make the markings that were shown where Adam Lanza allegedly shot into the school. Also, a man his size with Asperger’s disease wouldn’t have the coordination to shoot so many people so accurately in such a short period of time. Also, did you see the photo taken where the medical examiner was present at the school before the windows were shot out?
There is a documentary out called “Let’s Talk About Sandy Hook.” There is a book out entitled, “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.” It was banned on Amazon (even though another dozen books that sided with the false flag perpetrators remain for sale there) after selling 500 copies. It is now available for free in PDF form.
And then there is this:
Sandy Hook Justice Report: Avielle Richman, 1 of 20 Students That Supposedly Died At The Sandy Hook School Shooting, Has Been Verified By 28-Year Veteran Forensic Expert Witness As Being The Same Girl In The Photos of Lenie Urbina.
My purpose in showing this particular video was to show the inconsistencies, errors, and lies that surround the “official” Sandy Hook narrative. Individuals can make up their own minds about it.
LikeLike
December 21, 2015 at 6:37 pm |
At Sandy Hook Justice, I see a lot of weasel words under that headline:
”A veteran 28-year expert witness and legal consultant…has verified that the photos of both girls suggest that they are in fact the same person. We believe that the expert opinion provided to us is factual and have no reason to doubt his expertise, therefore the conclusion is that the pictures provided to the expert of Avielle Richman & Lenie Urbina suggest that Avielle Richman does not exist…”
Well, she doesn’t exist now, that much is certain.
One would think an expert investigator would seek several pieces of corresponding evidence. Birth records, for instance. Not birth certificates–certain parties have had abysmal failures with those in recent years—but as the alleged victim was a minor, it shouldn’t be difficult to find records of her existence. Certainly her enrollment at Sandy Hook Elementary would be a matter of public record, since she was reportedly murdered there! (I understand she was born in San Diego: heck, you could contribute to uncovering this ‘fraud’!) Has this legal consultant hired an investigator for what should be a routine search? I’m sure the victim’s family wouldn’t allow it, but DNA testing of the two girls would be extremely conclusive evidence.
I could understand one faked death…but 27? Including seven adults? We’d have to include Lanza’s mother on that list, because there’s no reason to believe she wasn’t in on it too. After all, the murder weapons were all hers.
If they manage to find even one more alleged ‘victim’ and demonstrate that this person is actually someone else—they really haven’t demonstrated that with Richman/Urbina—then they have a case, and a sensational one at that. But it’s still not going to keep from turning America into the world’s biggest shooting gallery.
LikeLike
December 21, 2015 at 6:45 pm |
I bow to your husband’s expertise on the AR-15. I’ve never fired one. But I do know that a semi-automatic weapon doesn’t really require accuracy, especially in a confined space. All it needs to do is put enough lead in the air. We know Lanza’s disease didn’t prevent him from reloading the rifles (we know his mother took him out to the firing range fairly often). He was in no hurry, after all; he expected to die there.
We know the weapons involved; they were clones of the US military rifle, one of them having the capability of accepting a high number (20+) of rounds, and both capable of semiautomatic fire. The 9mm Glock he seems to have reserved for his suicide.
”My purpose in showing this particular video was to show the inconsistencies, errors, and lies that surround the “official” Sandy Hook narrative. Individuals can make up their own minds about it.”
That’s exactly my purpose regarding the “official” Biblical narrative. But you seem to take it personally, rather than examine the evidence.
LikeLike
December 22, 2015 at 2:39 pm |
Ah…an abrupt segue back to your purpose here.
I have examined the evidence and it’s clear which one of us is following the Truth and which one of us chooses not to follow the Truth.
I like what this blogging pastor shares at his blog. Here is one example:
Prince of peace
LikeLike
December 23, 2015 at 1:20 am |
A segue into what you call ‘[my] purpose here’ allows you to dodge my questions again, as you so often do.
To ‘suggest’ and to ‘believe’ one has evidence is not the same as actually having evidence. Even if Avielle Richman is a non-person, nineteen children and six adults are still unaccounted for. Let’s see how far this hypothesis would get in a courtroom.
All I’ve done is provide you the opportunity for you to boast about how awesome your god is. What did the last line in your initial post say?
You might be led to despair after seeing and reading about all of this! But take heart! Jesus Christ has overcome the world!
There have been times on this blog when you’ve behaved as if you didn’t really believe that. I could cite examples, but I won’t spoil your Christmas and I certainly won’t let you spoil mine.
LikeLike