Kim Davis Interviewed by Megyn Kelly

Fox News: Exclusive: Kim Davis opens up about faith, threat to freedom

Sep. 23, 2015 – 3:57 – Kentucky clerk discusses the religious freedom controversy, ‘upholding’ the word of God on ‘The Kelly File’

Second portion of interview:

Kim Davis Answers Megyn’s Questions and Opens Up About Her Time in Jail.

Third portion of interview:

Exclusive: Kim Davis responds to her supporters and critics

Sep. 23, 2015 – 3:57 – Clerk at the center of a religious freedom conflict on how she made a difference on ‘The Kelly File’

The main point here is that those who are faithful followers of Jesus Christ, adhere to God’s Word, and desire accommodations when their faith, job, livelihood, and religious freedoms are being threatened; often do not get such accommodations.

Yet, Islamic terrorists at Gitmo get their religious accommodations.

What is wrong with this picture???

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Kim Davis Interviewed by Megyn Kelly”

  1. GMpilot Says:

    Well, there was the fact that Charee Stanley did not order the other flight attendants to not serve alcohol.
    She did not file a complaint with the FAA. She did not defy a federal law which would have compelled her to either serve alcohol or stop being an air hostess. Or did you choose to overlook all that?

    The main point here is that those who are faithful followers of Jesus Christ, adhere to God’s Word, and desire accommodations when their faith, job, livelihood, and religious freedoms are being threatened; often do not get such accommodations.
    How often does that happen, and can you provide an example when it hasn’t, apart from this one?

    Yet, Islamic terrorists at Gitmo get their religious accommodations.
    Sometimes. When some of them went on a hunger strike, their religious accommodations were ignored when it was decided to force-feed them. I doubt they had a choice in what they were fed.
    Not to mention that some of those ‘terrorists’ have been held at Gitmo for years without any charges against them. I doubt you can name any Christer in this country that has happened to.

    What is wrong with this picture???
    She submitted her objections to the federal appeals court, and then the Supreme Court, to put Judge Banning’s order on hold, and in both cases they did not. Presumably because she wanted them to help her break the law. Even Breitbart.com thinks that was a stupid idea. That’s what’s wrong with this picture!

    In short: public officials, when acting in their official capacity, do not enjoy the same First Amendment protections as private individuals. If they cannot fulfill all the duties of their position, they must resign.

    Like

  2. Frannie Says:

    Margaret Cho on Kim Davis: “She’s so gross. I don’t understand — she acts like she’s some kind of freedom fighter, as if she deserves some sort of accolade for not upholding the Constitution and breaking the law,” Cho explained. “It’s really insulting to the heroic people who have gone to prison for their beliefs.”

    I agree 100%.

    Oh yes…the next Christian faux martyr…she’s so persecuted!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: